Archive for June, 2006

第一类型危险

Friday, June 30th, 2006
片    名：<第一类型危险> (1980) Dangerous Encounters of the First Kind/ Don’t Play with Fire
导    演：徐克 (Tsui Hark)
编    剧：徐克 司徒卓汉
动作导演：程小东
出品公司：影艺
主    演：林珍奇 罗烈 吕良伟 车保罗 区瑞强 龙天生 胡大為
国    家：中國香港
类    型：犯罪 / 无政府主义 / 地下独立 / 后现代主义
时    长：95分钟uncut版
语    言：粤语

簡    介：
   
本片是真正意义香港电影史上第一部独立电影，是崛起于70年代末的香港新浪潮独立电影运动的启蒙影片，也是徐克的第一部剧情长片（1977年,拍摄于《蝶
变》和《地狱无门》之前，1980年解映），当年还算青年导演的徐克因为不满意于70年代中后期香港电影流于俗套的颓废现状，自投资金在77年独立拍摄了
这部充满后现代主义，愤怒的低成本朋克影片，由于片中过多的暴力场面，和无情的现实批判，使本片在香港被禁映，所以鲜为人知。

   
本片情節主要由兩組人物構成，其一是三個香港青年保羅（區瑞強）、阿龍（龍天生）和阿高（車保羅），他們嗜血成性，做人不負責任，深宵開車，撞死了路人
後，又不顧而去。他們這種行為被變態少女奀豬（林珍奇）目睹，她要脅三人與她一起胡混。於是四個少年男女大膽地自製炸彈，然後劫下日本客的旅遊巴士，又炸
死錢莊經理和他的保鑣。另一組人物則是越戰退伍美軍，在香港不斷從事暗殺行動，儼然是為錢賣命的恐怖分子。這兩組人馬結合碰出火花，是在於奀豬無意中撞破
了恐怖分子和黑社會的軍火交易，搶了他們交易用的大量日本銀票。自此，四個少年男女開始被當局通緝、遭黑道圍攻，當然還有退伍美軍的殘酷追殺。最後，他們
在墳場展開了大廝殺，終於統統死光！

   
本片是香港电影史上第一部被禁影片。全片沒有一个好人，人人心中都充滿了一股狂暴的怨气，視暴力发泄如家常便饭，徐克为拍出片中人的危险性，镜头极尽暴力
疯狂之能事，有不少大开杀戒的场面，而且有强烈的反社会的无政府主义倾向，使影片本身就成为一颗威力强大的炸弹，香港政府深恐造成社会不安，所以将其禁
映。徐克被逼无奈，将片名改为不直接露骨的《第一类型危险》，又改拍了不少过分暴力场面，柔化了其反殖民地主义立场，香港政府才于3年后将其解映，而正因
为这样才使本片成为香港独立电影史上的经典之作，导演徐克之后转投新艺城公司向商业片发展，从此再无此类型地下电影问世。 

65fd3c9be828912c60b4103b45c60ed1

008319910814687626

20051021115570652

CULT! TSUI HARK

Posted in Music & Movie | Comments Off

Google Checkout Launched

Friday, June 30th, 2006

checkout.google.com

         


            

         

      

 
             
                                 
            

            

 

         

            

Posted in Google | No Comments »

Toyota England

Friday, June 16th, 2006

source: automotoportal.com

0606120091

0606120092

0606120093

Posted in Sports | No Comments »

World Cup is coming

Thursday, June 8th, 2006

Channeltwo_1

Posted in Sports | No Comments »

Google Spreadsheets Launched

Tuesday, June 6th, 2006

Google Spreadsheets

Googlespreadsheets_1

Posted in Google | No Comments »

为自己·为老板·为员工

Monday, June 5th, 2006

Source: Fwd Messa

  1. 给人打工，首先肯定是为自己。养家糊口。
  2. 为了为自己，首先要为老板。为老板卖力，老板才能给工资、股份和期权。
  3. 要实现老板目标，必须组织队伍。队伍要有战斗力，小头目处处为自己手下着想。
  4. 这三者的利益，在企业处在上升期的时候，容易统一。企业发展停滞或者倒退的时候，矛盾就大了。
  5. 所以，上上策是保持事业蒸蒸日上。
  6. 正确的方向第一重要。所以，一定要在合适的时候，在合适的地方，干合适的事情。方向问题要一个月讨论一次，随时调整，修正。只要方向对，加以时日，早晚能成。
  7. 第二重要是要长远干，功败垂成最可惜。一定要等到收获期。怎样才能坚持住？
  8. 一个团队的价值=所创造的价值-成本。所以，在所创造价值还不确定的情况下，在成本上一定要保守。这样才能干得久，不容易崩盘。
  9. 第三、责权利明确后，容易做到公平，公平了，内部也就团结了。没有内耗的团结的精干的队伍能以一当十。
  10. 小团队做出大价值，员工分得自然多。这样作到了为员工。当然已经为了自己。当然也为了老板。

Posted in Philosophy | No Comments »

Companies Read Employee E-mail

Saturday, June 3rd, 2006

Reuters - Big Brother is not only watching but he is also reading your e-mail.

According
to a new study, about a third of big companies in the United States and
Britain hire employees to read and analyze outbound e-mail as they seek
to guard against legal, financial or regulatory risk.

More than a
third of U.S. companies surveyed also said their business was hurt by
the exposure of sensitive or embarrassing information in the past 12
months, according to the annual study from a company specializing in
protecting corporate e-mail at large businesses.

"What folks are
concerned about is confidential or sensitive information that is going
out," said Gary Steele, chief executive of Cupertino, California-based
Proofpoint Inc., which conducted the study along with Forrester
Research.

 

 

The top concern was protecting the financial privacy and
identity of customers followed by compliance issues and a bid to
prevent confidential leaks. Businesses ranked monitoring for
inappropriate content and attachments as less important.

Steele
also said on Friday that more and more companies are employing staff to
read outgoing e-mails of workers who typically have no idea their
correspondence is being monitored.

"It is not something that is
broadcast," Steele said. "There are organizations where employees think
they can say whatever they want to say and nobody is going to read it."

The
survey gathered responses concerning e-mail security from 406 companies
in the United States and the United Kingdom with more than 1,000
employees.

In both regions, 38 percent of respondents said they
employed staff to read or otherwise analyze outbound e-mail. In the
United States, 44 percent of companies with more than 20,000 employees
said they hire workers to snoop on workers’ e-mail.

Nearly one in
three U.S. companies also said they had fired an employee for violating
e-mail policies in the past 12 months and estimated that about 20
percent of outgoing e-mails contain content that poses a legal,
financial or regulatory risk.

Posted in Social | No Comments »